Is the dot forum a flop?

I don't see forums using the .forum TLD.

Was it a flop? Is it too expensive or too spammy?

I'm seeing the .blog TLD used on blogs but never the .Forum.

What do you all think?

I believe so. I don’t see the .forum extension as being feasible for community owners.

The .com extension is better or .net, however if you want to spend the money for a
.forum extension, then by all means for go it.

I don’t see it as a good idea. Forums have done well without it. There really hasn’t been too many forums using that extension, so yes, it’s a flop.

Nearly all ngTLDs (new generic TLDs) were a flop. The only ones that made money from it were ICANN with the 1000s of registration fees ($100,000~ I believe, with even more going into bidding for "great" dot keywords) and the registrars that sold premium names at hundreds to thousands of dollars to recoup those costs immediately on rush as users bought them up thinking they were the next great thing.

.forum is a good TLD. Maybe, not many people know about it. Never been suggested to me while searching for domain names.

frm said:

Nearly all ngTLDs (new generic TLDs) were a flop.

Click to expand...

I think you're right. I've been banning most of them from my cycling forum because I get so many spammers using them as their email.

Shawn Gossman said:

I think you're right. I've been banning most of them from my cycling forum because I get so many spammers using them as their email.

Click to expand...

I also think they don’t do well with the search engines either. They’re probably looked as “spam” by them too.

Cpvr said:

I also think they don’t do well with the search engines either. They’re probably looked as “spam” by them too.

Click to expand...

And that's crazy.

Why approve the creation of so many gTLD extensions if search engines are just going to see them as spam?

Shawn Gossman said:

And that's crazy.

Why approve the creation of so many gTLD extensions if search engines are just going to see them as spam?

Click to expand...

Some of them are used as spam, which make them get flagged.

For example:
. xyz Was heavily abused by spammers, though Google’s own use of .xyz has somewhat helped its reputation.

• .top Is Frequently associated with spam and phishing sites.

• .biz Was originally Initially intended for business use but often used by low-quality sites.

• .info Was Once a spam hotspot due to cheap registrations.

• .cf, .tk, .ml, .ga, .gq – Known as Free domains offered by Freenom, often used for scams and phishing.


• .work, .gdn, .men, .party, .click –They’re Frequently flagged for hosting questionable content.

Cheap or Free Registration – Domains that are cheap or free attract bad actors.

If spammers use a TLD a lot, search engines start flagging it.
If many sites on a TLD have thin content, Google may treat them with lower trust.

Some TLDs are blacklisted due to frequent association with scams. Such as, phising and malware.

If you’re running a legitimate site, stick to .com, .org, .net, .io, .co, or relevant country-code domains (.uk, .de, .ca, etc.). Newer TLDs like .ai or .dev have better reputations but still need careful use.

Everyone still remembers the .com more than any of them. I'll typically choose .com every time. I do have a .org for my NPO but the .com version transfers to the .org.

The .COM/.ORG/.NET will probably be the "standby" for years yet, as will the country associated domains. You still have people that chase those 2-5 letter TLD's in those vanity domains still, not realizing that they might get mistaken for the big names.. but generally not.
As for the vanity domains... they were an opening to spammers that could generate a site (for email or even web use) that emulated a well known old TLD site and are used to suck people in.
The big thing was, certain controlling parties saw an opening in which THEY could make big monies. The quality of the content on those sites was never a concern.